There are three very good reasons why my dad should have driven, rather than me. First, he has been driving twice as long as I have. He has been driving for nearly 60 years, while I just broke the 30 year mark. Secondly, he is a good defensive driver. On the other hand, according to my wife, I approach driving with a more offensive mindset. Okay, so I sometimes think Interstate 81 is the newest NASCAR course, those Ford drivers irritate me, and Dodges cannot run with my 2003 Subaru Outback with 240,000 miles. Put me at a traffic light on a highway and I think "Restart, baby! Don't even think you are going to beat me on the green light. Eat my dust, lady!" Guess where I get my competitive streak from--my dad. A final reason my dad would make a much better driver than me is because he has had fewer crashes (we won't count how many fewer). In my defense, all but one crash has been work-related, most on snow and ice-covered roads, and in only two was "Contributory Negligence" attributed to me. And I have been crash-free for a decade now.
I say all that to say this: when you have two occupants in a vehicle, there can be only one driver, and motorists can only hope that the more experienced, more defensive, more safe driver is behind the wheel. Who's driving is extremely important for numerous and obvious reasons.
When it comes to the life of faith (think of faith as our "vehicle"), there are two occupants: the text and theology. Here's a question to consider: Which one should "drive" the other? Should the text drive one's theology or should one's theology drive the text?
Life is full of study: There is archaeology, the study of past cultures (think Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom ); biology, the study of life (who can forget those fruit flies in high school?); oncology,the study of cancer (think Saint Jude's Children's hospital, Duke University Medical Center, or Johns Hopkins); psychology, the study of mental processes in living creatures (think Sigmund Freud...but not too much); technology, the study of the practical arts (think iPods, iPads, iPhones). However, it is theology, the study of God, that has been called "The Queen of the Sciences." Education originated in the church, by the church and for the church. The modern university was a direct result of church-based education. Dartmouth, Harvard, Princeton, and Yale were established to train ministers of the Word of God. Thus the preeminence of theology. Some of history's greatest thinkers were in fact theologians--Saint Augustine of the early church period; the great Reformation thinker Martin Luther; George Whitfield of the Great Awakening renown; and modern theologian C.S. Lewis, author of the popular books, The Chronicles of Narnia. Because of theology's passion and pursuit of the Divine, therefore, some might say, "Certainly, let theology drive."
The decision to let theology "drive" the text is perhaps made easier when one attempts reading through the ceremonial laws in the Old Testament book of Leviticus, the genealogies of 1 Chronicles, or Jesus' parables in the Gospel accounts. Someone might say, "Come on! Letting the text 'drive' in this situation seems a little...uncomfortable." Still others might suggest that the text and theology can take turns "driving." This journey we call faith is a rather long trip, so wouldn't it be best if the "driver" was determined by any number of factors? Have you ever thought, "Sure, the Lord's Prayer is perfect for being text-driven, but let's allow theology to 'drive' the creation account, the covenants, the cross and the consummation of all things? John 3:16? 'Drive, text, drive!' Romans 6-8? 'Theology, take me home!'"
It is my contention that neither of these approaches is the way to go. In my estimation, the text should always drive one's theology. Let me offer three reasons.
Reason #1: it is the text (Scripture) that is inspired, inerrant, infallible, authoritative and sufficient. Here is just a sampling:
- "All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, and for training in righteousness...." (2 Timothy 3:16)
- "The law of the Lord is perfect, reviving the soul; the testimony of the Lord is true, making wise the simple; the precepts of the Lord are right, rejoicing the heart; the commandment of the Lord is pure, enlightening the eyes; the fear of the Lord is clean, enduring forever; the rules of the Lord are true, and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, even much fine gold; sweeter also than honey and drippings of the honeycomb. Moreover, by them is your servant warned; in keeping them there is great reward." (Psalm 19:7-11)
- Psalm 119 in its entirety
- "No prophecy was ever produced by the will of man, but men spoke from God as they were carried along by the Holy Spirit." (2 Peter 1:21)
Reason #2: God cannot be known apart from revelation.
God has revealed Himself through general revelation--creation (Psalm 19:1; Romans 1:19-20) and through special revelation--primarily through Scripture and ultimately through the Lord Jesus Christ (John 1:1-5; Colossians 1:15-20; Hebrews 1:1-3a). Yet all that we can know about Jesus comes from...the text. How do we know that God is the Creator and Sustainer of all things? The Scripture reveals that.
How do we know that Jesus loves us? The Bible tells us so. How do we know that Jesus' death, burial, and resurrection has paid the price for our sins? The answer is found in the text. Apart from the text we could not and would not know anything about God's character, His thoughts, His deeds, or His plans.
Reason #3: Theology is both "unlicensed" and unwilling to drive.
My dad is licensed to drive, but he willingly handed me the keys on that day and allowed me to drive him. Simply put, God has not authorized ("licensed") our formulations and understandings of Him to trump what He has revealed about Himself in and through His Word. Furthermore, this really comes downs to willingness. Theology realizes that it originates from the text. No text, no theology. Theology "driving" the text would be like my dad's 3 year-old great grandson or 1 year-old great grand daughter driving their Papaw Rose. I would love to see all three of them in the same vehicle, but let's be realistic. Allowing these "unlicensed" little ones to drive would result in disaster! Sure, great grand kids make wonderful passengers, but they make unsafe drivers. Though a child might be willing to drive, theology is not, so it willingly hands the keys to the text and says, "You drive."
Don't think for a moment that theology is an unwelcome "occupant" in this vehicle we call faith. On the contrary, theology is a precious and priceless passenger, just like my dad's great grandchildren. There are no greater thoughts that can bounce around in our minds that thoughts about God. He wired us this way. Scripture says, "You shall love the LORD your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind" (Matthew 22:37). However, to force theology to "drive" the text would be like putting the keys to a car in the hands of a toddler. May we never be that unwise, that unsafe, and yes... that unbiblical.
Who's "driving" your faith?